وثائق و مقالات

مشاهد فيديو

أكذوبة موت المخ

الرد على الزعم بان مرضى موت المخ المزعوم لا يعيشون اكثر من اسبوعين
بعض المقالات التى تعترف بحالات تشخيص خاطىء ( لموت المخ ) المزعوم


 

 

Eur J Med. 2003 Sep. : (3) : 241-3

Electrocerebral silence with preserved but reduced cortical brain perfusion.

CASE REPORTS

European Journal of Emergency Medicine. 10(3):241-243, September 2003.
Heckmann, Josef G.; Lang, Christoph J.G.; Pfau, Matthias; Neundorfer, Bernhard

Abstract:
Isoelectric electroencephalogram in conformance with clinical findings is strongly suggestive of brain death. In clinical practice, isoelectric electroencephalogram in not-brain-dead patients is rarely seen. We report on a 53-year-old patient who suffered ischaemic encephalopathy after cardiopulmonary arrest. He had residual brainstem function with sufficient spontaneous breathing and evidence of cerebral blood flow on single photon emission computed tomography scan, but his electroencephalogram was isoelectric. He survived this condition for more than 7 weeks. This case demonstrates that isoelectric electroencephalogram can not be equated with brain death,  and that in prognostic assessment both clinical findings and supportive technical methods are mandatory.

__________________________________________________________

 

 

Human & Experimental Toxicology

Hum Exp Toxicol 2004 oct,23(10):503-5

Difficulties in assessing brain death in a case of benzodiazepine poisoning with persistent cerebral blood flow

Frédéric Marrache

Réanimation polyvalente, Hôpital Delafontaine, Saint Denis, France

Bruno Megarbane

Réanimation Médicale et Toxicologique, Hôpital Lariboisière, Université Paris VII-INSERM U26, Paris, France; Réanimation Médicale et Toxicologique, Hôpital Lariboisière, 2 Rue Ambroise Paré, 75010 Paris, France bruno-megarbane@wanadoo.fr

Stéphane Pirnay

Laboratoire de Toxicologie de la Préfecture de Police de Paris, Paris, France

Abdel Rhaoui

Marie Thuong

Réanimation polyvalente, Hôpital Delafontaine, Saint Denis, France

Assessing brain death may sometimes be difficult, with isoelectric EEG following psychotrope overdoses or normal cerebral blood flow (CBF) persisting despite brain death in the case of ventricular drainage or craniotomy. A 42-year-old man, resuscitated after cardiac arrest following a suicidal ingestion of ethanol, bromazepam and zopiclone, was admitted in deep coma. On day 4, his brainstem reflexes and EEG activity disappeared. On day 5, his serum bromazepam concentration was 817 ng/ml (therapeutic: 80-150). The patient was unresponsive to 1 mg of flumazenil. MRI showed diffuse cerebral swelling. CBF assessed by angiography and Doppler remained normal and EEG isoelectric until he died on day 8 with multiorgan failure. There was a discrepancy between the clinically and EEG-assessed brain death, and CBF persistence. We hypothesized that brain death, resulting from diffuse anoxic injury, may lead, in the absence of major intracranial hypertension, to angiographic misdiagnoses. Therefore, EEG remains useful to assess diagnosis in such unusual cases.

__________________________________________________________

 

 

The Canadian Journal of neurological Science

Can J Neurol Sci.2003 Nov,30(4):305-6

Simulation of Brain Death from Fulminant De-efferentation

Yael Friedman A2, Liesly Lee A2, John R. Wherrett A2, Peter Ashby A2, Stirling Carpenter A2

A2 Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada.

Abstract:

Background: Guillain-BarrÈ syndrome (GBS) classically presents with a subacutely evolving areflexic paralysis, with typical laboratory findings of elevated cerebrospinal fluid protein and abnormal nerve conduction studies. There is now an increasing recognition of GBS variants that differ in clinical presentation, prognosis, electrophysiology and presumed pathogenesis. Fulminant cases of GBS have been reported in which a rapid deterioration evolves to a clinical state resembling ìbrain deathî. Methods: A retrospective analysis of two such cases of fulminant neuropathy are described, that includes the clinical course, electrophysiology and neuropathology where available. Results: We describe two patients that presented with a rapid course of neurological deterioration, lapsing into what resembled a ìclinically brain-deadî state that was subsequently ascribed to a fulminant polyneuropathy. Investigations (electrophysiological, pathological) and the clinical course suggested an axonal neuropathy. Conclusions: A fulminant neuropathy can result in a clinical state resembling ìbrain deathî through diffuse de-efferentation. Although generally attributed to aggressive demyelination with secondary axonal degeneration, a primary axonopathy can also lead to a similar clinical presentation.

__________________________________________________________

 

 

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001 Dec 29;145(52):2513-6

Totally paralyzed or brain dead?
[Article in Dutch]

van Dijk GW, Vos PE, Eurelings M, Jansen GH, van Gijn J.

Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, Postbus 85.500, 3508 GA Utrecht. g.w.dijk@neuro.azu.nl

In two patients, men aged 23 and 42 years, a condition that mimicked brain death was observed as a consequence of rapidly progressive complete peripheral paralyses, which included the intrinsic and extrinsic eye muscles. However, the EEG revealed a waking pattern. Maximal supportive therapy was provided, which included haemodialysis for the first patient and artificial ventilation for both patients. A slow recovery was seen after four weeks. The first patient was paralyzed following the ingestion of a large quantity of ethylene glycol and the second by botulism due to the consumption of injudiciously canned food. In patients with catastrophic brain injury, the diagnosis of brain death can be confirmed by a clinical neurological examination. In considering the diagnosis 'brain death', the most important criterion is that the cause of the brain damage is established. If the cause is insufficiently, the presence of brain death should be seriously doubted, unless an isoelectric EEG is observed.

__________________________________________________________

 

 


Neurol Clin.1999 May;17(2):295.
Brain death.
Beresford HR.

Cornell Law School, Ithaca, New York 14853-4901, USA. bersford@law.mail.cornell.edu

Current law in the United States authorizes physicians to diagnose brain death by applying generally accepted neurologic criteria for determining loss of function of the entire brain. This article offers a medical-legal perspective on problems that may arise with respect to the determination of brain death. These include the possibility of diagnostic error, conceptual disagreements that may constrain the use of neurologic criteria to diagnose death, and the conflation of brain death and loss of consciousness. This article also addresses legal aspects of the debate over whether to expand the definition of brain death to include permanent unconsciousness. Although existing laws draw a clear distinction between brain death and the persistent vegetative state, many courts have authorized removal of life support from individuals whose unconsciousness is believed to be permanent on proof that removal accords with preferences expressed before sentience was lost.

__________________________________________________________

(Ref PM7)