وثائق و مقالات

مشاهد فيديو

 

جرائم نقل الاعضاء

 

 

اولاً : سرقة الاعضاء البشرية فى بريطانيا :

---------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------

 

ثانياً : قصة قتل مرضى الغيبوبة العميقة بأيدى الاطباء فى مستشفى كليفلاند  بالولايات المتحدة كما نشرت فى الصحف الامريكية على لسان  الشهود من الاطباء ( بالانجليزية )
و مقال لمراسلة أخبار اليوم (بالعربية) يشير الى الضجة الوسعة التي حدثت في المجتمع الأمريكي عند نشر الجريمة

 

THE HEART-STOPPING
TRUTH ABOUT ORGAN DONATION

Article by Steve Salerno

It's said that doctors bury their mistakes. Sometimes they dissect them first

“What the hell are they trying to do, kill people?” The question stuck in Cuyahoga prosecutor Carmen Man-no's head, and his craw. It was the morning of September 10, 1996, and Marino had spent 90 minutes listening to two of his constituents voice concerns about a new medical protocol they had uncovered. The procedure was about to be implemented at the most august piece of medical real estate under Marino's jurisdiction, the Cleveland Clinic. Nearing the end of a successful three-decade career, Marino had no desire to square off with the clinic. But what he'd just heard led him to a startling realization: that if the protocol were implemented, he would file homicide charges against the physicians at the Cleveland Clinic.

In attendance at the meeting were graduate student Peggy Bargholt and Bargholt's professor at Cleveland State University, Mary Ellen Waithe, who also served as the school's director of advanced studies in bioethics. It was Bargholt who, the previous fall, had learned of the new protocol.

Like Marino, Bargholt wasn't looking for a fight. She'd always been a vocal advocate of transplantation, and she had given much more than lip service to the movement. Fifteen years earlier her three-year-old had died of a brain hemorrhage linked to a congenital defect. She donated his organs and became one of the first mothers to go public with her story. Subsequently, Bargholt worked for LifeBanc (a regional OPO) and spoke on behalf of transplantation. She'd also put considerable energy into Family Lodge, her proposed low-cost hospice for patients and families awaiting transplants at the Cleveland Clinic.

Friends at LifeBanc told Bargholt that the new protocol would save lives by deepening the pool of potential donors. The document's chief author was Dr. James Mayes, who is director of LifeBanc and a top surgeon at the clinic. Dr. Mayes had based his work on the regimen used at the University of Wisconsin, the so-called “church of transplantology.”

The deeper Bargholt got into the document, the more uneasy she felt. The protocol was designed for patients who had suffered catastrophic head injuries and required ventilator support

but were not yet certifiably brain-dead. It recommended infusing such patients with two drugs, Regitine and heparin. Bargholt, a one-time nursing student, wondered why they'd be giving such large doses of a blood thinner like heparm to comatose patients with cranial bleeding. Something else bothered her:

The protocol told doctors to make decisions about the presence or absence of a heartbeat by feeling for a pulse at the carotid artery. She thought, My God, you're at the Cleveland Clinic. Why go groping around somebody's neck? Hook him up to a heart monitor!

Bargholt went on to read how doctors would wheel patients into an operating room and turn off the ventilator. The patient's heart, deprived of oxygen, would stop. Two minutes later, surgeons would begin the harvest. Such patients would become, in the odd lexicon of the transplantation community, NHBD — non-heart-beating donors.

By the time she finished reading the document, Bargholt felt shaky. She recalls, “Under this protocol, I didn't know if the patients would actually be dead when the surgery started. And if they weren't, I couldn't get past the thought that the transplant surgery might be what killed them”

She made a presentation on the protocol to her bioethics class. Waithe was stunned. The two women resolved to get to the bottom of things—albeit discreetly. This was, after all, the Cleveland Clinic.

They soon learned that Regitine, or phentolamine mesylate, was an obsolete blood vessel dilator now used in minute dosages as an injectable alternative to Viagra. It had fallen out of favor in hospital settings because of its severe side effects. Phentolamine could cause a precipitous drop in blood pressure—and possible cardiac arrest—even in its usual therapeutic dosage of five milligrams. The protocol called for twice that. Waithe's mention of the phentolamine regimen to someone at the FDA elicited this reaction: What are they trying to do, kill people? Bargholt got the same response from a friend who worked for the state pharmacy board (which in Ohio has police powers not unlike the DEA).

It became clear that neither phentolamine nor heparin was the usual choice for people with grave head injuries. For such patients, the drugs could have disastrous effects, flooding an already bloated cranial cavity with more fluid while masking signs of life by muting the carotid pulse—the pulse doctors were told to feel for.

Convinced that they were onto something, Bargholt and Waithe drafted a critical paper for the Journal of the

American Medical Association. In May 1996, the same month they submitted their paper, they approached the Ohio attorney general's office. They spent the next several months trying to get a straight answer from both parties. By mid-July JAMA had rejected the article, while the attorney general's office was giving them the “dog ate my homework” treatment, says Waithe. The following month Bargholt's contact at the pharmacy board arranged a meeting with her supervisor. They all drove separately to the Ohio boondocks. After a four-hour cloak-and-dagger session that Waithe describes as “right out of Silkwood,” the pharmacy board representatives agreed that if procedures outlined in the protocol were taking place, they could be construed as criminal.

On September 10, Waithe and Bargholt went to see Carmen Marino.

Marino and his staff spent the ensuing weeks studying trauma care and transplantation. The prosecutor discovered that the mortal enemy of internal organs was a condition called warm ischemia, or deprivation of blood and oxygen due to diminished blood flow. The longer an organ was deprived, the less viable it was. He also learned that transplant specialists measured viability in minutes, not hours. It was crucial to keep organs bathed in blood as long as possible. That explained why, in brain-dead patients, surgeons allowed the heart to continue beating even while they took other organs. It also explained the proposed use of phentolamine and heparin.

Marino contacted the prosecutor's office in Madison, Wisconsin, whose university's procedures had inspired the LifeBanc document. “That's medical stuff,” he was told, “we don't interfere.” Somebody else he talked to shrugged the whole thing off. “It was like, 'What's the big deal?” Marino recalls. “If their respirators are turned off, they'll die anyway, right?”

Marino knew that seriously injured people often needed cardiorespiratory support while their brains healed. In time, they might return to full function. Or they might end up grotesquely impaired. Or they might die. In any case, he thought, what business did these administrators have deciding whose life was worth saving?

After satisfying himself that the protocol hadn't yet been implemented—if it had, he would have gone straight to the grand jury—Marino requested a meeting. “I know doctors and lawyers don't get along real well,” he says now, “but let me tell you, there are some of the most arrogant sons of bitches you'll ever come across at the Cleveland Clinic.”

Marino said that the doctors were outraged—at him, at the “traitorous”Bargholt, at the fact that Marino's office had the balls to go snooping around without “consulting” them first. “This one guy gets up and says, basically, 'How dare you confront us on this. We're fainous doctors, and this is our business. Who are you to tell us what we can and can't do?' And he says how he's going to 'challenge' us.

“I stared at him and said, 'Look, you can do that if you want. Just understand, friend, that the challenge is going to take place in a courtroom, with a charge of homicide. And any doctor who participates in operations under this new protocol will be an accessory to that homicide!” Marino remembers the way he and the doctor glared at each other until someone on the clinic side finally said, “Don't worry about it, Carmen, it's OK. We're not going to go that route.”

Today, Marino says the clinic's about-face allowed him to go into retirement feeling vindicated. “Doctors shouldn't be in the business of rounding down patients' lives to a lower number,” he says. “People are entitled to live until they actually die.”

For Bargholt, though, it was a Pyrrhic victory. She stopped getting invitations to transplantation functions. An erstwhile friend accused her of being responsible for the death of a teen who'd been awaiting a transplant at the clinic but couldn't get one because the scandal caused donations to drop. She was even voted off the board of Family Lodge by some of the same people she'd recruited as directors. “I was blackballed,” she says, “because I wanted doctors to make sure people were dead before they took their organs.”

 

ثالثاً :اختطاف الاطفال من الدول الفقرة ومن مناطق النزاع لقتلهم و انتزاع اعضائهم :

---------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------

 

 

 

قتل الاسرى لانتزاع اعضائهم :

 

رابعاً : انتزاع الاعضاء من المحكوم عليهم بالاعدام فى الصين وهم احياء

---------------------------------------------------------

أضغط هنا لمشاهدة افلام فيديو عن (انتزاع الاعضاء من المحكوم عليهم بالاعدام فى الصين وهم احياء )

 

خامساً : قتل مرضى الامراض العقلية لانتزاع اعضائهم :

---------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------

المفهوم الثالث من مفاهيم موت المخ(وهو موت المراكز العليا للمخ) ينطبق على مرضى الامراض العقلية والحالة الخضرية الدائمة و المواليد ناقصي القشرة المخية.. وبذلك فان اكذوبة موت المخ تعطي مبرراً لارتكاب جريمة انتزاع الاعضاء من مرضى الامراض العقلية و قتلهم بحجة الحاجة الى اعضائهم .. راجع مفاهيم المخ الثلاثة و هي موت كل المخ - موت جزع المخ - موت المراكز العليا للمخ في المجلة السعودية لنقل الاعضاء المرفقة

---------------------------------------------------------

سادساً : محاولات  تحويل مصر الى مركز لبيع الاعضاء لاثرياء المنطقة :

بنك العظام  يهدف الى  الوفاء باحتياجات الدول العربية والافريقية :

---------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------

 

قائمة اسعار العظام التي يبيعها البنك  - تجهيز العظام و تقطيعها مثل البطاطس (الشيبسي)

 

وزير الصحة السابق (أ.د. اسماعيل سلام) يحذر من ان اي مشروع قانون لنقل الاعضاء يسمح للمستشفيات الخاصة والاستثمارية بنقل الاعضاء سوف يؤدي الى تحولها الى سوق لتجارة الاعضاء
(محضر اجتماع مجمع البحوث الاسلامية) بتاريخ 24 ابريل 1997

---------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------

سابعاً : تجارة الاعضاء البشرية تمارس فى جميع دول العالم :

في الهند :

فى اوكرانيا

فى تركيا :

 

بين دول العالم على الانترنت

---------------------------------------------------------

 

ثامناً : التسويق لتجارة الاعضاء فى كافة دول العالم .. اعلانات فى الصحف المصرية  تعرض  على المرضى المصريين زراعة الكبد فى المانيا بصورة اسرع وارخص  وتعد بتقديم التسهيلات !!

 

 

 

تاسعا : منظمات طبية امريكية لنقل الاعضاء تدعو الى اعطاء مقابل مادى للأهل لأخذ موافقتهم على انتزاع أعضاء مريضهم .. و اطباء نقل الاعضاء يطالبون في مجلات عالمية طبية باباحة شراء الاعضاء من الاحياء دون قيود:

---------------------------------------------------------

 

---------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------

 

عاشراً : بعض المنظمات الطبية العالمية تتراجع أخيراً عن دعوتها لحرية تجارة الاعضاء بعد ازدهارها و تورط الاطباء فيها :
 

---------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------